So I came across the Fidelizer program and - taadaaah - the HQPlayer plays “at the next level”. All “shelves” are empty and my piggy bank too…. Now the moon prices come into play, which are demanded lately for Nvidia cards, if you can buy them at all. According to the HQPlayer manual, a computing power greater than 5 is required, but my card can only do 3. Problem: I could offload some of the computations to the Nvidia card GPU if, yes if it had enough computing power. ![]() Makes itself sonically very leasantly noticeable. ![]() As you can imagine a lot of computing power helps a lot, especially since the converter (Denafrips Pontus) also processes DSD. (personally I take care of setting up audio systems and customizing systems on request). Summary: Daphile is not worth the effort. It should be better tested audiophile optimizer (I haven’t tried it). favor of Daphile: dedicated audio environment. it would be better with an audio streamer player that has quality components than NOT a mini pc (this is obvious with the DAC but the USB output of the pc, which should be isolated from the charging function, cost: 300 euros or more). ![]() WI_FI wired network, identical: audio DEFECTS. (the same cannot be said of DAPHILe who works blindly, not being able to drive the players nor really know how they work and how they have been designed (changes to the wave signal). FIDELIZER PRO: the TOP at the moment It is NOT possible to create a dedicated environment and we rely on CORE isolation with EXCELLENT function: LINEAR natural harmonics output, you can feel sensibilmtne SILENCE AND that the windows processes do not INTERACT in the audio: natural sound never heard in a windows environment. It is first to listen to Spotify (IDENTICAL philosophy and mobile use). As always I find the flaw: NOT natural sound.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |